<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Proud Profiteer &#187; Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proudprofiteer.com/tag/obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com</link>
	<description>Capitalism and Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fannie and Freddie Tab Could Hit $363 Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/10/fannie-and-freddie-tab-could-hit-363-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/10/fannie-and-freddie-tab-could-hit-363-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSEs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proudprofiteer.com/?p=2437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Wall Street Journal, the tax payer may be looking at another $363 billion bailout, but this time just for Fannie and Freddie. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac&#8217;s regulator said Thursday that the companies could end up costing the government $363 billion as they absorb losses from bad mortgages. Fannie Mae and Freddie [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/10/fannie-and-freddie-tab-could-hit-363-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Would Make Drug Laws &#8220;Greatly Complicated&#8221;, Let&#8217;s Hope</title>
		<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/10/california-would-make-drug-laws-greatly-complicated-lets-hope/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/10/california-would-make-drug-laws-greatly-complicated-lets-hope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gestapo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proudprofiteer.com/?p=2422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California has a initiative on the upcoming ballot to legalize marijuana, and it looks like it has the feds worried. Attorney General Eric Holder said the Obama administration &#8220;strongly opposes&#8221; a California ballot measure to legalize marijuana, warning that federal drug-enforcement efforts would be &#8220;greatly complicated&#8221; if the measure passes. I was under the impression the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/10/california-would-make-drug-laws-greatly-complicated-lets-hope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fannie and Freddie may cost tax payers $1 trillion</title>
		<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/fannie-and-freddie-may-cost-tax-payers-1-trillion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/fannie-and-freddie-may-cost-tax-payers-1-trillion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proudprofiteer.com/?p=2316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this article this morning on the Tribune Review. Just think about the amount of money that is going to go into these two government entities, and what the people actually get out of it. WASHINGTON — The cost of fixing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage companies that last year bought or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/fannie-and-freddie-may-cost-tax-payers-1-trillion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Say Bye Bye To Your Secret Swiss Bank Account</title>
		<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/say-bye-bye-to-your-secret-swiss-bank-account/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/say-bye-bye-to-your-secret-swiss-bank-account/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proudprofiteer.com/?p=2311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Switzerland has been the home of off shore banking for a very long time. People who want to keep their money off shore, are doing it to protect their money from the modern day mafia, the US gov&#8217;t. Well, not for long. The Obama administration has vowed to go after those who believe their money [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/say-bye-bye-to-your-secret-swiss-bank-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obama&#8217;s Demand For A BP Fund Just A Way To Limit Liability?</title>
		<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/is-obamas-demand-for-a-bp-fund-just-a-way-to-limit-liability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/is-obamas-demand-for-a-bp-fund-just-a-way-to-limit-liability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proudprofiteer.com/?p=2306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no doubt BP has bungled the handling of this oil spill. What is even more bungled is the government&#8217;s back and forth trying to act like they are or even can do something about this that will actually help. Most recently, Obama is now calling for a fund to be setup to pay [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/is-obamas-demand-for-a-bp-fund-just-a-way-to-limit-liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Frank Isn&#8217;t Being Fair With Laissez-Faire</title>
		<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/thomas-frank-isnt-being-fair-with-laissez-faire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/thomas-frank-isnt-being-fair-with-laissez-faire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Frank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proudprofiteer.com/?p=2281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning I was reading a piece by Thomas Frank, the token idiotic liberal over at the Wall Street Journal. His piece is an argument against people calling for laissez-faire capitalism, and he uses the oil spill as his proof that we need government. Just last week, for example, the Washington Post featured a 2,500-word [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/06/thomas-frank-isnt-being-fair-with-laissez-faire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What The Sestak Controversy Should Really Tell You</title>
		<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/05/what-the-sestak-controversy-should-really-tell-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/05/what-the-sestak-controversy-should-really-tell-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 11:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sestak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proudprofiteer.com/?p=2266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media has been all a buzz with the Sestak scandal. Republican hacks have been jumping ugly that they might have something on Obama. Maybe they do. I don&#8217;t really know the law, but in Obama&#8217;s explanation there is something more revealing. Something that should tell all of us what government is all about. Here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/05/what-the-sestak-controversy-should-really-tell-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to Demagogue His Masters</title>
		<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/04/obama-to-demagogue-his-masters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/04/obama-to-demagogue-his-masters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endthefed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proudprofiteer.com/?p=2135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to make it seem like the government and the banking sector aren&#8217;t one in the same, President Obama is rolling out his teleprompter to deliver a speech blasting Wall Street for acting like a bunch of ignorant drunks. Who cares that the Fed was supplying the booze. From the Wall Street Journal President [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/04/obama-to-demagogue-his-masters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There May Be Hope For Internet Freedom &#8211; Court Rules Against FCC</title>
		<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/04/there-may-be-hope-for-internet-freedom-court-rules-against-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/04/there-may-be-hope-for-internet-freedom-court-rules-against-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proudprofiteer.com/?p=2040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals actually stood up for the free market and property rights. Let&#8217;s hope this is a sign of things to come. The DC circuit Court of Appeals gave the Obama administration a big dash of cold water on the limits of its authority to impose rules on communications networks [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/04/there-may-be-hope-for-internet-freedom-court-rules-against-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we heading towards dictatorship?</title>
		<link>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/04/are-we-heading-towards-dictatorship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/04/are-we-heading-towards-dictatorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dictatorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Ringer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea-party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proudprofiteer.com/?p=2033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Ringer has a blog up about a coming US dictatorship. In my article ”Saying Yes to the Party of No,” I commented on how pleased I’ve been to see Glenn Beck talking about a subject I’ve been writing about since the late seventies: a government-declared state of emergency leading to a ”temporary” dictatorship. I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proudprofiteer.com/2010/04/are-we-heading-towards-dictatorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

